Moralized-Assured-Destruction: Killing the Right, One Virtue Signal at a Time

How the Media Sanitizes Left-Wing Violence

and

Oct 10, 2025

The New Normal: Political Assassination and the Media Spin

Once again, a conservative figure has been assassinated. And once again, the Associated Press responded by framing it as part of “a spike in political violence in the United States across all parts of the ideological spectrum.”

They did not hesitate. Before the facts were known, they rushed to dilute the meaning of what had just happened. The implication was clear. No side is innocent, so no side is to blame.

This narrative is dishonest. It ignores the lopsided pattern of political violence that has unfolded in recent years. Conservative figures continue to be attacked, threatened, and vilified with increasing frequency, while their killers are often portrayed as mentally ill or socially frustrated rather than politically motivated.

The institutions responsible for informing the public now serve as shields for a movement that refuses to acknowledge its own excesses. The press obscures intent. Universities downplay responsibility. Political leaders gesture toward unity while signaling approval through omission.

No one is held accountable because no one is allowed to speak clearly. And when clarity does appear, it is buried beneath layers of false balance and strategic vagueness.

Upside Down Land: The Criminals are the Good Guys

I just saw a scripted movie on Apple TV. The premise is that the most dangerous criminals in the world are accidentally set free. You might be tempted to watch it, but you don’t even need to. Those criminals are already on your streets.

We talk about the high-profile killings, but we ignore the real horrors. The number of people permanently injured, scared, raped, and driven to suicide. All by the false compassion that has been permeated by a corruption of the Judeo-Christian notion of compassion. This was predicted by René Girard in his Memetic Theory.

Girard called this the “satanic inversion” of the Gospel: when the concern for victims is mimetically hijacked to justify new forms of persecution.

Compassion becomes a pretext for vengeance.
Victimhood becomes a currency of power.
And mimetic rivalry rages beneath a veneer of justice.

And this is where we find ourselves. It is impossible for the liberals to recognize their actions as immoral or as the cause of these catastrophes. Similarly, the conservatives cannot admit to all of the catastrophes they caused by creating endless wars and military conflicts in the Middle East. When they couldn’t start a real war, they used special operations and CIA assets to overthrow governments, destabilizing the Middle East.

Of course, Obama continued their legacy, fulfilling none of his promises. I still remember being stationed in Guantanamo Bay, so happy he was closing it, only for him to never fulfill a single promise. So, for that reason, I do not give the Democrats much credit either.

These conflicts are the precursors to our modern illegal immigrant crisis, so I believe they are necessary to mention. We cannot have this discussion without first acknowledging this. On the same token, we can see that this is also part of the argument for tolerating importing these people. There is an assumption of guilt for the past, something modern liberals have no defense against.

A liberal professor scolded me in 2021 for saying liberals are for open borders. At the time, I apologized because I thought I had gone too far. I rescind that apology.

However, the past is the past. We cannot wallow in self-hate based on things that happened. We live in the now, and on the home front, there is no question. The liberals had been leading a steady move to the left since the 1970s. Now it has been taken to the extreme, in recent years, all across the West. So let’s look at the facts.

How Did We Get Here?

The Overton window is so insanely out of whack that the extreme left thinks that it is in some sort of war. They live in a fantasy world where racism runs rampant and neo-confederates run through the south causing chaos. The reality is that they are hunting down any trace of the memory of the things they have already destroyed. They succeeded in getting the monuments in Richmond taken down. Monuments, no one really cared about until they started complaining. But that wasn’t enough for them. They had to travel to South America, where in Brazil, there was a group of like 1,000 people. Descendants of emigrated ex-confederate soldiers who were offered land in Brazil. They had a neat little get-together once a year, and they dressed in antebellum-style clothing. They waved a flag that has zero meaning in that country. This is not a Nazi flag that represents a specific ideology. This is a flag that holds meaning based on the context in which your mind frames it. But that can not be. Organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) need an excuse to exist, and they successfully pressured the government of Brazil to declare the Confederate flag/the rebel flag a hate symbol in a country where it has no meaning.

Sorry, but you’re completely harmless, 150+ year tradition where people of multiple races are getting together to have fun in a completely different country, is over. The self-hating white woman from America has spoken.

There is no anti-hate campaign; it is an ideological extermination. Consider once again that Ms. Beirich of the SLPC studies “racism in academia”, a field so devoid of racism against anyone not white that they had to invent terms like “micro-aggression” to find anything to talk about. This, while completely ignoring the obvious racism of “anti-whiteness”. I mean, the racism is right there in the word. What in the world are you people talking about? Again, this woman is so out of touch that she had to go to BRAZIL to find something to do.

On the same token, these types of people act outraged that the Irish are proud of their red hair. They demand things like this be cancelled, because you know, not everyone has red hair. So what? There is no celebration that is too small for them to campaign against. But this is the world petty bureaucrats are trying to build. The only culture they respect is the culture of twerking, Palestinian flags, and riots. They absolutely love their riots.

Release the Hounds of Hell

In this section, I am just going to show you examples of the kind of people, all across Western society, who are being released. These are not rare cases in the US, Canada, and the UK…

If you’re thinking, “This is impossible, how could people let this happen?” Please see the quote below, and you will know exactly the type of person who allows this to happen.

And as we can see, the ignorant are a great source of pain for the actual vulnerable in our society.

To Free Our Will or Not: That is the Question

The idea of letting these people free is absolutely insane. We are given two choices when it comes to being held responsible:

The idea that all humans have free will and have a duty to live that out and make changes.

This is the idea of the sane. In fact, research backs this up. Belief in free will is specifically a sign of well-being, as the research shows. In addition, if you believe in free will, it means you can change. You are not fated to act the same way, regardless of circumstances.

So, if you are a criminal now, it is in the best interests of society to try to reform you, and not to lock you away forever to prevent your future criminality, as you can change.

The Nietzschean idea is that you are not responsible for your choices.
“The doctrine of the will has been invented essentially for the purpose of punishment, that is, because one wanted to impute guilt.”
— Twilight of the Idols, “The Four Great Errors,”

This is the most common view held by most left-wing scholars. The idea comes from Friedrich Nietzsche, who believed that we are fated and that we really have very little, or in fact no choice, in how things happen to us.

When you hold this view, it must be reasonable to conclude that people are not responsible for their actions. They were simply born that way. In fact, according to findings from a large-scale Swedish national adoption study, genetic factors play a substantial role in criminal behavior. The study showed that adoptees whose biological parents had criminal convictions were significantly more likely to engage in criminal behavior themselves, even when raised by non-criminal adoptive parents. In contrast, the influence of the adoptive parents’ criminality was much weaker. This suggests that hereditary factors may account for a majority of the variance in criminal behavior, estimated in some analyses at around 50–60%, while environmental factors such as upbringing contribute a smaller portion, roughly 20%.

However, if you have caught on by now, there is a huge problem here. If people can’t be redeemed, then why are we rehabilitating them? They won’t change; they will just kill, rob, and steal, again. If you subscribe to this view, then how can you even advocate for rehabilitation? You need to be in quarantine.

Well, somehow, the liberal-minded have pulled it off. They hold the most conflicting views to have ever been conceived. They hold that the perpetrator is not a perpetrator at all; they are a victim of genetics. Worse still, not even a genetic lottery, but a fixed game of roulette. If your number lands on the spinner wrong, you’re screwed. We can’t cure you. Yet, instead of concluding that they need to be locked away, they will never change, they now reason, “This is a victim of circumstances, we must set them free”. Set them free to terrorize again?

Now I, of course, don’t hold this incredible anti-human view. It is necessary to rehabilitate criminals. If we can save 1 out of 10, then I believe it is worth it. Even if we couldn’t, I believe in the human right to try. The conservative view, which is really just the view everyone had until 2013, is the view that does not believe in injustice for the victim, nor the perpetrator.

Now, admittedly, I had said, “They hold the most conflicting views ever conceived.” But of course, it’s important for us to realize, that isn’t true. As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote in The Gulag Archipelago:

And you could stab him only after he had stabbed you. And therefore it was quite easy to draw up a case against a citizen who had merely drawn his knife from his pocket, without even having had a chance to use it! And if he had used it, then he was all the more guilty! Because he had dared to defend himself! (And the fact that he had been attacked was not taken into account at all.)

And once again, we see the true face of this New Leftist ideological movement. Call it Socialism. Call it Satanism. Call it suicidal empathy. Call it a manifestation of a larger macrosocial explosion of Cluster B psychopathology. Whatever it is, it is a cultural malaise that needs to be cured. We cannot live like this.

“Macbeth’s self-justifications were feeble – and his conscience devoured him. Yes, even Iago was a little lamb, too. The imagination and spiritual strength of Shakespeare’s evildoers stopped short at a dozen corpses. Because they had no ideology. Ideology – that is what gives evildoing its long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination. That is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others’ eyes.... That was how the agents of the Inquisition fortified their wills: by invoking Christianity; the conquerors of foreign lands, by extolling the grandeur of their Motherland; the colonizers, by civilization; the Nazis, by race; and the Jacobins (early and late), by equality, brotherhood, and the happiness of future generations... Without evildoers there would have been no Archipelago.”
—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, chapter four, The Gulag Archipelago

Would a country in East Asia, the Middle East, the entirety of Africa, or Eastern Europe ever let these people run free? I have no more words.

“Believe All Women” Means Import Rapists?

I remember when we were supposed to “Believe all women”. In fact, I remember the exact event when the push really got started. It was an incredibly famous case, because in 2006, gang rape was something almost no one had ever heard of. Now it’s just the norm throughout large swaths of Europe. Most horrifyingly in England and Sweden.

In fact, if you hear about a gang rape, you simply say “Wow, that’s horrible” and then you go about your day. This is universally true when it is done by anyone who is non-white. Unfortunately, these lacrosse players, later exonerated as the entire case was a grand work of fiction, were white.

She ruined the lives of everyone who came in contact with her. After this false rape, she then went on to murder her boyfriend. #BelieveAllWomen

I honestly thought back then the outrage was about the rape, the false rape, that is. Now I realize the men and women yelling really didn’t care about the rape; they cared about the race of the accused. Hopefully, you can forgive me, you see, I thought we were in a world coming to grips with racism and finally ending it. What I didn’t realize was that it was now payback time. Payback for things, people who are long dead, had done to people who were also long dead. At first, I thought this was odd, but for some reason, this spirit of spit and revenge has always been a part of Democratic, left-wing ideology.

Why do socialists always form paramilitary groups? The KKK, the National Socialist (NAZI’s), Che Guevara, the list goes on.

Now they are, of course, doing this song and dance again. Once again, it is not about protecting women; it never has been. If you wanted to protect women, would you import people from hostile cultures, then suppress the voices of the people who speak out against this violence? “But it’s only a minority of them that commit these crimes.”

Even if there were only a few rapists per 100,000 imported, of course, we can see it’s many more than that, but still, how could you justify thousands of rapes that would have never happened had you not added these people to the population? That is quite literally the point of vetting immigrants. To keep out rapists, murderers, arsonists, thieves, the list goes on. In the past, one foreigner committing a rape was an atrocity. People would take to the streets. Well, now it’s so common no one even notices. Some estimates have found that over 100,000 indigenous British women, targeted because of their skin color, were groomed and raped by Muslim rape gangs.

Remember when they were made, 40-year-old Hollywood actors were dating 18-year-olds? Why don’t they care that 50-year-old Muslim immigrants are raping 14-year-old white British women? Well, I just answered my own question. But still, where is the pink pussy hat brigade? Bitching about the right to kill the babies they aren’t ever going to have. It was a death cult, not a pro-woman cult. We can forgive you for not seeing that sooner, of course.

Selective Memory

The pattern is not hard to see. There is no shortage of examples. They are simply ignored.

Woman executed in her own by career criminal with 40 PRIOR ARRESTS
A woman was recently murdered by a repeat offender who had been released by a judge pushing progressive reforms. No, this is not the Ukrainian refugee woman also killed by a career criminal. This is yet ANOTHER one. This has become so common that we don’t even notice anymore. And of course, no national outcry followed
Attempted assassination of Donald Trump
Last year, an individual attempted to assassinate Donald Trump. The bullet missed. A second attempt was foiled. The story vanished almost immediately.
Nashville school shooting by a trans-identifying shooter
A shooter who identified as transgender attacked a Christian school. The firearms were covered in anti-Christian slogans. Officials refused to assign a motive. Of course, this comes as many of these people put on crazy hormones have committed insane crimes. Like the Minnesota school shooter, Robin Westman.
It’s basically a joke at this point. If you’re a world leader, all you need to do is say “racism, misogyny, antisemitism, Islamophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, hate speech.” The more of them you stack in a speech, the more you're allowed to ignore your voters. Sorry, that’s the rule.
Jewish men murdered in Washington, D.C.
In the nation’s capital, two Jewish men were gunned down by a left-wing extremist. Their names faded from the headlines within hours.
Republicans targeted at a congressional baseball game
A gunman opened fire on Republican lawmakers during a baseball practice. He asked their party affiliation before shooting. The incident was quickly rebranded as a one-off.
Rand Paul assaulted by neighbor
Senator Rand Paul was blindsided and beaten by a neighbor. He suffered six broken ribs and a collapsed lung. The attacker received 30 days in jail. Luckily, another judge bumped it up to 8 months.
Black Lives Matter riots
During the BLM riots, federal courthouses were set on fire, police stations were overrun, and entire city blocks were vandalized or destroyed. These events were reframed as a righteous uprising.
The Palisades fire
Jonathan Rinderknecht is the one who started the Palisades fire, not “climate change”. He’s charged with destruction of property by means of fire and faces up to 20 years in federal prison if convicted. He could face additional charges associated with the property damage and 12 lives lost in the Jan. 7 fire. The fact that he isn’t getting life for the 12 people killed by his fire is crazy.
Attempted assassination of Brett Kavanaugh
Somehow, this person only got 8 years…

Each of these cases tells the same story. When the perpetrator leans left, the media downplays the ideology. When the victims lean right, the press moves on. The pattern is not only consistent. It is deliberate.

Counter-Protests and Campus Cowardice

What the fuck even is counter-protesting, and why is it allowed? Counter-protesting has become a sanctioned form of mob suppression. What was once framed as civil disagreement is now a tool for silencing. On college campuses, especially, the tactic has evolved from free expression into intimidation. The institutions responsible for order have allowed it to spread.

We’ve all seen the scenes. A conservative speaker is invited. Students organize a protest. The protest becomes a blockade. Entrances are obstructed. Classrooms are surrounded. Faculty look the other way. No one is arrested.

This is not a spontaneous outburst. It is a coordinated method of control. It feeds off institutional weakness, and it grows with every unpunished act. But this is not new. The tactic has a history.

The Evolution of Counter-Protesting

Labor Movement (19th–early 20th century)
Union strikes were often met with mobs of “loyal workers” organized by employers. These counter-protests were designed to break picket lines and protect the status quo. Police frequently took the side of the counter-protesters.
Civil Rights Era (1950s–1960s)
Civil rights activists were regularly confronted by segregationist mobs. Groups like the KKK and the White Citizens’ Councils organized counter-protests to disrupt marches and block desegregation. These actions were often supported by local law enforcement and political leaders.
Vietnam War Period (1960s–1970s)
As anti-war protests gained traction, “pro-troop” rallies were staged in response. These often escalated into open conflict between left-wing student groups and working-class counter-protesters. The Nixon administration used these confrontations to create political theater.
Culture War Flashpoints (1980s–1990s)
Counter-protests shifted toward cultural and moral issues. Outside abortion clinics, pro-life and pro-choice activists regularly clashed. LGBTQ+ parades were met with religious protests. The tone was more personal, and the violence more sporadic, but the divisions deepened.
Post-9/11 and Partisan Realignment (2000s)
After 9/11, war protests were countered by pro-military rallies. The culture hardened into two distinct political camps. Movements like the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street existed in parallel, but rarely in direct confrontation.
Campus Mobs and Deplatforming (2014–present)
This is where the tactic changed form. Counter-protests were no longer about debate. They became about removal. Conservative speakers are now shouted down, physically threatened, and forced off campuses. The goal is to prevent the event from happening at all. Universities rarely intervene. In some cases, they enable it.
Charlottesville and Beyond (2017–present)
The 2017 rally in Charlottesville triggered a new era of counter-protest escalation. Antifa and similar groups began showing up in force, often with tactical gear and organized communications. Clashes became expected. One person was killed. The response from the press focused entirely on one side. Why can antifa show up with actual military gear and weapons, but the other side is the one to blame?

The Legal Illusion

In theory, all of this falls under free speech. In practice, it is mob control. Courts have ruled that disruption, harassment, and physical obstruction are not protected. But these rulings are rarely enforced. On campus, there are no consequences. In progressive cities, prosecutors decline to press charges.

A Cowardly Infrastructure

Administrators do not want trouble. So they give the mob what it wants. Speakers are disinvited. Security is reduced. Students are told to stay quiet and stay away. In this environment, there is no real freedom of speech for one side. But permission to shut down speech is granted to the other.

Counter Protests Need to Go

How do we stop this? Pretty fucking easy. John Smith is coming to speak on campus about something 50% of the student body doesn’t like. They organize the “John Smith is a Fascist” anti-protest. When John Smith comes in, multiple people throw objects at him. Everyone who throws an object is thrown off campus. It is quite literally that simple. That basic standard is not being upheld right now.

The second is, if you are forced to get a permit, so is the “counter-protest”. And, while we’re at it, on a different day. If you have to go through all that trouble, why do they get the right to ruin your activism with their group of 20 people when you have 2000? And if this group is known for acting exactly like Hitler’s Brown Shirts while claiming not to be anti-fascist, i.e., the pro-Fascism group Antifa, why would they be approved? Of course, they were finally designated a terrorist group. But remember when militias were designated terrorist groups, yet they never facilitated a single citywide riot? Odd.

The Weaponized Narrative

When facts do not serve the narrative, the narrative is adjusted. The framing becomes the story. The public is not shown what happened. They are told how to feel about it.

After the recent assassination, Yahoo News decided to do a fact check. They showed that Charlie Kirk had called George Floyd a “scumbag”. They present this as if this is something that almost everyone hasn’t already said. He was a scumbag. He was a fentanyl addict. He wasn’t taking care of his kids. He held a gun to a pregnant woman’s stomach. What about that is not scumbag behavior?

But this approach of acting like we’re shocked and appalled at normal opinions is not new. It has become standard.

When political violence comes from the left, it is labeled as mental illness, personal grievance, or unrelated frustration. The shooter had a hard life. The attacker was confused. The riot was caused by poverty. Nothing is ever directly linked to ideology unless it supports the approved conclusion. Political violence from the left has not emerged from their ideology alone. The right does not carry out acts of violence because mental illness is not encouraged. The insanity of the left encourages cluster B personality to run rampant in their ranks.

When violence comes from the right, real or imagined, the conclusion is immediate. It is labeled as extremism. It is called terrorism. The ideology is printed in headlines before the suspect is named.

Hate crime statistics are treated as sacred until they contradict the preferred image. When a man in North Carolina murdered a white woman and said, “got that white woman,” it was not logged as a hate crime. When a church shooter covered his weapons with anti-Christian slogans, no motive was confirmed. The facts were known. The labels were withheld.

This pattern exists everywhere. Schools, media outlets, nonprofits, and federal agencies all operate under the same assumptions. Some participants are aware of what they are doing. Others believe they are simply following the data. But the data has already been filtered.

The system is not neutral. It is partisan. It does not report what happens. It decides what deserves attention and what does not.

The Final Reckoning

The facts are not hidden. They are simply ignored. It’s important to remember that socialists have no God they are loyal to. Unlike the atheist brought up in a Judeo-Christian environment, they are not anchored to truth via education either. They can, they will, they are compelled to lie.

“We say that our morality is entirely subordinated to the interests of the class struggle of the proletariat.”
— Lenin, “The Tasks of the Youth Leagues” (1920)

Actions, including deception, are considered moral if they serve the revolution. We find this again and again. Abstracted onto the general ideal of the modern left, it just means they get to say whatever they want. Furthering the Leftist agenda is supreme.

We have seen the assassinations. We have seen the riots. The arson (don’t worry, it’s “mostly peaceful”). The attacks on churches and synagogues. We have seen the selective enforcement of law, the double standards in sentencing, and the silence that follows every act of violence committed by the approved side.

We are told this is all part of a larger problem. We are told the threat is broad and growing. We are told it is complex. But the people saying this are the same ones who benefit from the confusion.

But this cannot last. Every institution that refuses to correct itself eventually collapses from within. Every movement that justifies violence will one day find that violence pointed in its own direction. There will be a reckoning. The only question is, how much longer will it take?

The charts are back and forth, depending on the political party you belong to, the results seem to correlate with your side, see below: