There's No Wage Gap, No Patriarchy, and Defund the WNBA
Contemporary Feminism is a Cultural Toxin
I remember a woman in my master’s program who was fascinating for all the wrong reasons. She was certifiably insane; she once bragged about getting a professor fired simply because he “didn’t like foreigners”. He just didn’t like her. No one did. She could hijack any conversation to cast herself as the main character in every scene. Well, minus the charm, talent, and wit. I used to wonder why her “friends” tolerated her at all, until I learned that women are prone to maintain relationships even when they’re blatantly toxic. This is because women are experts in reputation sabotage. Keeping an unstable narcissist close is often less about friendship than self-preservation, because God only knows what she’ll do when slighted. A wounded narcissist with a score to settle is a dangerous animal.
And this summarizes the reality that is modern feminism. It’s run by hatred, anger, and fear of the truly destructive cluster B women positioned at the top. Oh, and ironically, men.
There are countless examples of this across modern society. We have bent over backwards to the requests of women because we mistakenly believe the past was unjust to women. Manipulative cluster B women have used this anger to manipulate other women to their pet causes. Even worse, these cluster B types also use false causes to sabotage other women’s mating potential. In fact, this is a common mating tactic among less attractive women to reduce the competition from their more attractive competition. And it works.
Just as bad, men have used it to make women more available for sex, more willing to be one of many partners, and to fulfill whatever perverse fetish they may have. The idea that this isn’t happening is rooted in the idea of female agency. For women, at the root of most of their decisions, there was a man pulling the strings. We can see this in the endless hordes of immigrants that white, college-brainwashed women vote to bring into their countries. When we do buy into the unlimited and pathological empathy of the feminine, they end up importing the very people who will victimize them. We have seen this for 25 years with mass immigration. Somehow, these statistics are not good enough for them to show compassion for their fellow women. Of course, that assumes women like other women.
Unfortunately, women just don’t like each other that much. Every week, we have to read another article about how women don’t get along because of men. Wow, really showing your agency there. This trend is particularly pathological. Women are now branding each other “pick me’s” for wanting attention from men. “The 'pick me' I know brags about receiving attention from men…”. That screams manipulative female, trying to limit her competition. I mean, really, that is some sick and twisted manipulation. But women fall for this. They genuinely believe they should eschew male attention, while still wanting to be with a man. It’s no wonder 25% of women will never get married in the West. Keep listening to the Queen Bees who make these rules for you. Go for it. And then it just gets worse. These women get grouped en masse under the guise of feminism. Instead of being empowered, this simply opens up the floodgates to the cluster B females and the psychopathic males, who want to manipulate them.
To further illustrate the lack of ability of large groups of women to fend off these manipulative types, we can see that the ability to speak out among groupthink is specifically tied to testosterone. If you expect a room full of Beckys from HR to raise concerns about anything that might actually be harming the group instead of helping, you clearly haven’t worked in corporate. The only thing feminism has done for women is possibly help women organize during suffrage. You won, like 100 years ago; you have nothing left to gain from these leeches but pain and misery. All they do now is screech like craven witches in the dark about imaginary problems.
A great example of these operations to undermine their competition can be found in the cobwebbed halls of the former newspaper turned home-for-the-histrionic, The New York Times. I remember back in 2016, how these histrionic types would use instrumental manipulation to attack targets. First, they would find three tweets that back up their fake outrage, publish an article that the entire world is offended, and get people kicked off Twitter. Below, we can see their more modern attempts at fabrication. This is the perfect example of a problem histrionic cluster B personas invent to sabotage other women.
The New York Times, which has a gift for taking the private neuroses of its most unstable contributors and marketing them as social movements, gives us a masterclass in fabricating a social movement. The latest is “heterofatalism,” a term so contrived it begs to be used as public discourse. Supposedly, it’s the dawning realization among women that men are so irredeemably awful that heterosexual relationships are doomed. In reality, it’s a columnist refabbing her own dating failures into a fake trend, hoping other bitter women will adopt the label and join her in the warm bath of mutual resentment. Women, this is your recruitment flyer.
Their only real tools are manufacturing anger and imagining the world as one vast conspiracy against them. In science, evolutionary biologists get mocked as “just storytellers”. Well, if that’s true, then these women are the greatest fiction writers in literature and science, attempting to make their personal grudges into contrived social movements.
This works only because there’s an audience of women eager to be told that their personal dysfunction is a political awakening. They learned no moral lessons as a child. No religion. No ethics classes. Nothing. Empty vessels looking for some easy pathology to latch onto.
The WNBA, a Hotbed of Mean Girl Pathology
Nowhere is this more obvious than in the WNBA, a league that has become the perfect petri dish for grievance culture.
Every so often, its players pop up in the news with the same tired demand: “Pay us what we’re worth.” Currently, you’re worth less than nothing. The league has never been profitable, not once in its history. It loses money each year. Without NBA welfare it would not exist. This is the perfect example of loud women complaining when there is nothing to complain about. You are getting paid to do what you love. The average salaries are around $102,249, on par with European league pay for professional rugby and other sports, except those leagues turn a profit.
And yet, in a league with so little genuine public interest, one player has managed to break through the apathy. Caitlin Clark has become the league’s reluctant poster child, a gifted athlete who can draw crowds in a sport that normally struggles to make anyone care. Some say her cold reception from teammates is about race, seems somewhat obvious. You would think they would be happy someone is watching, but that doesn’t match up with female in-group dynamics. In male sports, a rookie who plays at an elite level is often celebrated, even by rivals, because excellence raises the game for everyone. In female sports and group dynamics in general, the instinct is usually the opposite: close ranks and shun the outlier.
In fact, women don’t even like being close to each other after a competition. This is all indicative of the longhouse effect, a leveling impulse where anyone who rises too far above the group threatens the harmony and must be cut down to size. Not surprisingly after all, women are brutal cyberbullies as the research shows. Bullying the successful is just female interpersonal psychopathology. The truly pathological females are so bad you can’t even trust them to give you a haircut without trying to sabotage your mating success.
And after all this well-known research, somehow with their witch magic, this behavior gets blamed on a fictitious patriarchy, a construct that has never existed. This only distracts from the real problem: we have no mechanism to deal with female psychopathology at this scale. In fact, we outright deny its existence. Male psychopathology gets confronted through mentorship, initiation rituals, corporal punishment, public shame, honor cultures, religious morality, community surveillance, and even psychological intervention, sometimes involuntary. With women, we just encourage it.
The Ghost of Lena Dunham Strikes Another Blow to Women
The Guardian wrote a piece on Lena Dunham’s new show. You may remember her a the weird girl who made a show about depressed women.
In reality, we all thought Lena Dunham died. Not in the literal sense, of course. Just that she would not haunt our screens anymore. When she first wrote a show about how depressing it is to live in Manhattan (Been there, done that, would not recommend) and how terrible the people who live there are, we were all glad to see it end. But, alas, her exile is thus ended, for she has arisen once again from the grave, like yet another unwanted Walking Dead spinoff, to teach a new generation of women how to be insufferable to any man that hasn’t been castrated.
Well, God is once again challenging his strongest soldiers. And BREAKING NEWS, women are not loud enough. I am shocked. Who would believe something like that? That’s the entire premise of this show. I won’t go in deeper because there’s nothing to mine. To be clear, I feel bad for her. She is clearly mentally unwell. She insists on telling gross stories, including a weird one about her little sister I have no interest in telling you about, but you can follow the link if you dare. In reference to the story, some people said she abused her sister. It just seems like some awkward things that some kids probably do. The weird thing is feeling the need to tell people about it. And this underscores the entire problem of feminism from its inception. We are expected to listen to these gross stories and be extremely hyped to hear them. Like how they absolutely can’t survive until they use red for tampon commercials. No one wants to see your bloody tampons you loons.
We thrust these strange stories to the height of human experience, as if they are something to aspire to. Like everyone wants to sit around and talk about weird shit. No, we want to watch normal movies that show humanity at its best. But all of our culture has been taken over by miserable liberals who want to tell you the gross stories that they should probably just tell their therapist instead. Maybe spare her too, for humanity’s sake. Makes you wonder why no one wants to see movies anymore, and people scroll their phones when they have a TV show on.
Well, even after all that nonsense, here is Lena again to make us dislike modern feminists even more. A real statistic that should worry women is that 30% of women aged 30-35 have never had children. It’s one of those “We say we’re happy not having children,” but you can see it in their eyes that it’s a lie. Or that rape rates rise dramatically with illegal immigration and bail reform. But absolutely not, this show cannot talk about real problems women have. The real problem is (checks notes) MEN!
Now, every failed journalist turns a bad Tinder date into a column, every TikTok girl performatively cries in her car to garner attention at the latest trend, every podcast whining about “my truth” are all Lena’s bastard kids. Her legacy is a permission slip for women to vomit their dysfunction onto the rest of us and demand we clap while choking it down.
The Gender Pay Gap was Debunked Two Years Ago, by a Woman
Just wanted to add this in real quick. I’m not going to discuss it at length because it’s already been debunked. I’m just spreading awareness at this point. After all, feminists are still complaining about a 46-year-old statistic from the 1979 U.S. Current Population Survey saying they purportedly made 77 cents to a man’s 1 dollar. They have used that same study for 50 years. Not just to be wrong, but also annoying. Of course, it was a misinterpretation of the math, but don’t let that stop you from a false narrative. Go off queen.
Female Dating Value is Tied to Attractiveness
When a guy gets rejected, it sucks, but we take it as feedback. Maybe it was looks, maybe it was confidence, maybe we were just off that night. Men know we can change the variables. Hit the gym, sharpen the banter, make more money. Rejection stings, but it’s also data. You regroup, you improve, you try again. That’s the male ego: we take a beating, and then we do it again and again until we figure it out.
For women, their entire dating value is tied up in something they can only change marginally: how hot they are. Sure, they can hit the gym and learn to contour, but there's a ceiling. Sure, they can have a great personality, but again, it only goes so far. So when a woman actually works up the courage to make a bigger move than giving a look across the bar, and gets up and talks to a guy, it’s a big deal. If she gets rejected, she’s really only got two choices. She wasn't attractive enough or he is a flawed human being in some way.
He's gay. He's intimidated by successful women. He's obviously got mommy issues. He's probably a creep anyway, look how he was talking to that waitress. The hamster wheel starts spinning, and suddenly his polite "not interested" becomes evidence of deep psychological problems. He didn’t reject me; it’s that he's fundamentally broken as a human being.
This is why male rejection hits differently than female rejection. When we turn women down, we're threatening their entire sense of self-worth. And since that's unbearable, they have to make us the villain in the story. The ego must be preserved at all costs, even if it means torching the guy's reputation on the way out. And they love doing that. It’s pretty funny that the UVA college rape hoax, a hoax that blamed a fraternity for a rape that never happened, kicked off the #MeToo nonsense. Seems fitting, a fake story starting a contrived movement. Real rape victims will suffer because of this selfishness. And these men had their lives destroyed because of it. Luckily, the victims are going to get their just deserts.
All of this, to protect ego.
Marrying the Maid
High-earning men don’t just happen to marry women who stay home. The numbers are clear: at the very top, almost half of these men’s wives earn less than five percent of household income. Among the top one percent, the majority of wives aren’t working at all. That isn’t random chance. Men who make serious money know that financial inversion poisons a relationship. When the man provides, the order feels natural. Flip it, and no matter how many slogans get thrown around about empowerment, the house fills with resentment.
Sociologists have found this for decades. Alexandra Killewald’s work shows that men who don’t fulfill the breadwinner role face higher odds of divorce, not because of poverty but because the dynamic feels wrong to both sides. Amazingly, Time, another formerly respected news organization, calls these facts “stereotypical”, even though they’re universal and are not likely to change in any significant way. And of course, we haven’t even covered the fact that women don’t want to date down anyway. Is that sexism on the part of women? Pretty sure it’s just reality.
And for this reason, high-status men avoid the trap altogether. They don’t marry their peers; they marry women who are free to focus on the home. Meanwhile, highly educated women complain about the shortage of “suitable” men because they refuse to marry down. The data leaves little mystery: men who climb to the top don’t want competition across the dinner table, and women who climb to the top don’t want to bankroll their boyfriends. Pretty obvious stuff here, but it’s 2025 and people don’t read, so you need to spoon-feed them.
The Great Workforce Lie
Another banger, we keep hearing this fairy tale that women marching into the workforce “doubled household wealth.” Bullshit. It didn’t double anything except prices (That and printing money). When one income could buy you a house, raise a few kids, and maybe even stash something for retirement, families were stable. Now? Two adults grind forty, fifty hours a week just to keep the lights on and food in the fridge. Of course, two incomes would raise the price of everything by double. Have you read a single economics textbook?
And then our salary asks were too high. So they outsourced the labor. Now that we’re finally demanding more money, they’re just replacing us again, but in our own country. Enter the H1B visas. Right now, they’re telling us it’s not happening and we’re overreacting, which means it is happening exactly as we think it is, but it hasn’t reached a point where they have to admit it. All of this just to realize that now childcare without a woman to care for the children is as expensive as having a second job in the first place. Again, of course, this happened.
And what’s the trade-off? Lowering their IQ’s by bottle feeding. Outsourcing infant years to iPads. Teachers and administrators fresh out of universities, looking to found New Jonestown with your children. They see your kid as a blank canvas for their half-baked politics. Forcing women into the workforce through feminism has been great. Luckily, women are getting over the “empowerment” lie.
And of course, every woman reading this from her oak office in the new faculty lounge is spitting out her coffee at the gall of this man. And every woman behind the counter at Dollar General is thinking the opposite. Thinking that every woman gets to have your exciting job is of course, a luxury belief. But they don’t care anyway, after all, they have an au pair.
And that’s the grift: Working “liberated” women, who got cool jobs, and forced the rest of the women to work shit jobs. They can keep working because and so we can hand our children off to people who have gone through the factory farm of academia to create low-IQ-mystery-meat teachers. The home stopped being the center of life and was ceded to the state, dressed up in “education” branding. And the result is obvious. Parents come home exhausted, kids come home radicalized, and every family wonders why it has zero cohesion.
Feminism has always been a pathology that feeds on the fresh blood of unsuspecting young women. Every time it eats one problem, it’s invents a problem to replace the previous. Like the climate change wack-a-mole game we’ve been playing since the 1970s, it’s a perpetual motion machine of misery, fueled by resentment. No one is saying women shouldn’t be this or that. We’re saying this fake bullshit narrative that women have to be in charge of 50% of everything is fundamentally flawed and backed up by research.
The proof’s everywhere. From Lena Dunham turning her diary into a hazmat spill, to WNBA players demanding paychecks from a league that can’t pay the rent, all the way to columnists coining fake trends to mask their own anti-social flaws. The reward system runs on victimhood, and the most unhinged voices always rise to the top.
We're getting closer to a point where we realize feminism has never helped anyone. I'm looking forward to this realization.
This article seemed to peel things straight out of my brain that I've been trying to coherently verbalize since at least 2017. This one got me to bite the "paid subscriber" bullet, and I thank you for saying what needs to be said.