There's No Wage Gap, No Patriarchy, and Defund the WNBA

Contemporary Feminism is a Cultural Toxin

I remember a woman in my master’s program who was fascinating for all the wrong reasons. She was certifiably insane; she once bragged about getting a professor fired simply because he “didn’t like foreigners”. He just didn’t like her. No one did. She could hijack any conversation to cast herself as the main character in every scene. Well, minus the charm, talent, and wit. I used to wonder why her “friends” tolerated her at all, until I learned that women are prone to maintain relationships even when they’re blatantly toxic. This is because women are experts in reputation sabotage. Keeping an unstable narcissist close is often less about friendship than self-preservation, because God only knows what she’ll do when slighted. A wounded narcissist with a score to settle is a dangerous animal.

And this summarizes the reality that is modern feminism. It’s run by hatred, anger, and fear of the truly destructive cluster B women positioned at the top. Oh, and ironically, men.

There are countless examples of this across modern society. We have bent over backwards to the requests of women because we mistakenly believe the past was unjust to women. Manipulative cluster B women have used this anger to manipulate other women to their pet causes. Even worse, these cluster B types also use false causes to sabotage other women’s mating potential. In fact, this is a common mating tactic among less attractive women to reduce the competition from their more attractive competition. And it works.

Just as bad, men have used it to make women more available for sex, more willing to be one of many partners, and to fulfill whatever perverse fetish they may have. The idea that this isn’t happening is rooted in the idea of female agency. For women, at the root of most of their decisions, there was a man pulling the strings. We can see this in the endless hordes of immigrants that white, college-brainwashed women vote to bring into their countries. When we do buy into the unlimited and pathological empathy of the feminine, they end up importing the very people who will victimize them. We have seen this for 25 years with mass immigration. Somehow, these statistics are not good enough for them to show compassion for their fellow women. Of course, that assumes women like other women.

I just took a trip to Poland last week after living in Germany for the last few months. There was one thing they were missing. You get three guesses, and the first two don’t count.

Unfortunately, women just don’t like each other that much. Every week, we have to read another article about how women don’t get along because of men. Wow, really showing your agency there. This trend is particularly pathological. Women are now branding each other “pick me’s” for wanting attention from men. “The 'pick me' I know brags about receiving attention from men…”. That screams manipulative female, trying to limit her competition. I mean, really, that is some sick and twisted manipulation. But women fall for this. They genuinely believe they should eschew male attention, while still wanting to be with a man. It’s no wonder 25% of women will never get married in the West. Keep listening to the Queen Bees who make these rules for you. Go for it. And then it just gets worse. These women get grouped en masse under the guise of feminism. Instead of being empowered, this simply opens up the floodgates to the cluster B females and the psychopathic males, who want to manipulate them.

To further illustrate the lack of ability of large groups of women to fend off these manipulative types, we can see that the ability to speak out among groupthink is specifically tied to testosterone. If you expect a room full of Beckys from HR to raise concerns about anything that might actually be harming the group instead of helping, you clearly haven’t worked in corporate. The only thing feminism has done for women is possibly help women organize during suffrage. You won, like 100 years ago; you have nothing left to gain from these leeches but pain and misery. All they do now is screech like craven witches in the dark about imaginary problems.

A great example of these operations to undermine their competition can be found in the cobwebbed halls of the former newspaper turned home-for-the-histrionic, The New York Times. I remember back in 2016, how these histrionic types would use instrumental manipulation to attack targets. First, they would find three tweets that back up their fake outrage, publish an article that the entire world is offended, and get people kicked off Twitter. Below, we can see their more modern attempts at fabrication. This is the perfect example of a problem histrionic cluster B personas invent to sabotage other women.

The New York Times, which has a gift for taking the private neuroses of its most unstable contributors and marketing them as social movements, gives us a masterclass in fabricating a social movement. The latest is “heterofatalism,” a term so contrived it begs to be used as public discourse. Supposedly, it’s the dawning realization among women that men are so irredeemably awful that heterosexual relationships are doomed. In reality, it’s a columnist refabbing her own dating failures into a fake trend, hoping other bitter women will adopt the label and join her in the warm bath of mutual resentment. Women, this is your recruitment flyer.

Their only real tools are manufacturing anger and imagining the world as one vast conspiracy against them. In science, evolutionary biologists get mocked as “just storytellers”. Well, if that’s true, then these women are the greatest fiction writers in literature and science, attempting to make their personal grudges into contrived social movements.

This works only because there’s an audience of women eager to be told that their personal dysfunction is a political awakening. They learned no moral lessons as a child. No religion. No ethics classes. Nothing. Empty vessels looking for some easy pathology to latch onto.

---

The WNBA, a Hotbed of Mean Girl Pathology

Nowhere is this more obvious than in the WNBA, a league that has become the perfect petri dish for grievance culture.

Every so often, its players pop up in the news with the same tired demand: “Pay us what we’re worth.” Currently, you’re worth less than nothing. The league has never been profitable, not once in its history. It loses money each year. Without NBA welfare it would not exist. This is the perfect example of loud women complaining when there is nothing to complain about. You are getting paid to do what you love. The average salaries are around $102,249, on par with European league pay for professional rugby and other sports, except those leagues turn a profit.

And yet, in a league with so little genuine public interest, one player has managed to break through the apathy. Caitlin Clark has become the league’s reluctant poster child, a gifted athlete who can draw crowds in a sport that normally struggles to make anyone care. Some say her cold reception from teammates is about race, seems somewhat obvious. You would think they would be happy someone is watching, but that doesn’t match up with female in-group dynamics. In male sports, a rookie who plays at an elite level is often celebrated, even by rivals, because excellence raises the game for everyone. In female sports and group dynamics in general, the instinct is usually the opposite: close ranks and shun the outlier.

“Female participants were more likely than men to think that competing with same gender coworkers was undesirable and unacceptable, that it was simply ‘not right’.”

In fact, women don’t even like being close to each other after a competition. This is all indicative of the longhouse effect, a leveling impulse where anyone who rises too far above the group threatens the harmony and must be cut down to size. Not surprisingly after all, women are brutal cyberbullies as the research shows. Bullying the successful is just female interpersonal psychopathology. The truly pathological females are so bad you can’t even trust them to give you a haircut without trying to sabotage your mating success.

And after all this well-known research, somehow with their witch magic, this behavior gets blamed on a fictitious patriarchy, a construct that has never existed. This only distracts from the real problem: we have no mechanism to deal with female psychopathology at this scale. In fact, we outright deny its existence. Male psychopathology gets confronted through mentorship, initiation rituals, corporal punishment, public shame, honor cultures, religious morality, community surveillance, and even psychological intervention, sometimes involuntary. With women, we just encourage it.

Another great example here. Women blaming men for their own shortcomings. Oh an unusual lense, wow that’s so novel. I can’t wait to read, let me just place fire ants on my eyes first.